![]() ![]() 11, 12 The current study also estimates the cost per HIV-infected patient correctly notified of his/her test result. ![]() Previous economic analyses of rapid HIV tests used a test that is more difficult to perform and no longer on the market. This article presents new estimates of the costs of the conventional and rapid testing procedures in these different scenarios. The purpose of this research was to estimate the costs of conventional and rapid HIV testing in three scenarios to illustrate the differences among testing strategies and technologies. 10 However, rapid tests typically cost more to perform than conventional tests. 8, 9 Compared with conventional testing with an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), rapid tests increase (by a factor of 1.5 to 2.2) the likelihood that both HIV-infected and uninfected patients receive their test results, because the results are delivered during the initial visit. Consent for HIV testing is included in the general informed consent for medical care.Ĭoncurrently, HIV screening has increasingly used rapid tests that provide test results during the same health-care visit. With this approach, patients are informed that an HIV test will be performed unless they decline, and information about HIV infection is often provided in writing. 7 Because extensive pretest prevention counseling and written informed consent specifically for an HIV test sometimes posed barriers to testing, a streamlined screening strategy was recommended. 6 Also, people aware of their infection are likely to change their behaviors and reduce the risk of infecting others. 5 Testing based on risk assessment often fails to identify many infected people. 4 The goals of the new CDC recommendations are to increase the number of people aware of their infection through routine testing and to link them with appropriate care and treatment. 2, 3 The earlier policy involved the provision of counseling and testing after patients gave specific informed consent for an HIV test.Īn estimated 25% of people infected with HIV are unaware they are infected. 1 This policy contrasted with previous recommendations for routine counseling and testing for people at high risk for HIV and for those in acute-care settings in which HIV prevalence was greater than 1%. In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued revised recommendations advocating voluntary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening for all patients aged 13 to 64 years as a normal part of medical practice in health-care settings including hospitals, acute-care clinics, and sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics, unless the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection has been documented to be less than 0.1%. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |